|
|
Education and Work, 1996
PEDCOMP Completed Education
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
YES 1.00 3446 68.7 85.1 85.1
NO 2.00 603 12.0 14.9 100.0
. 966 19.3 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4049 Missing cases 966
PEDOLD Age Completion Education
Valid cases 3473 Missing cases 1542
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PEDQUAL Highest Educational Qualification
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NONE 1.00 53 1.1 1.1 1.1
PRIMARY COMPLETE 2.00 288 5.7 5.9 6.9
SECOND NO UE 3.00 2132 42.5 43.4 50.4
SECOND COMPL 4.00 437 8.7 8.9 59.3
OTHER TERTIARY 5.00 925 18.4 18.8 78.1
UNIV INCOM 6.00 418 8.3 8.5 86.6
DEGREE 7.00 656 13.1 13.4 100.0
. 107 2.1 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4909 Missing cases 107
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PMARRY Marital Status
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
MARRIED 1.00 3274 65.3 66.0 66.0
WIDOWED 2.00 349 7.0 7.0 73.0
DIVORCED/SEP 3.00 389 7.7 7.8 80.9
SINGLE 4.00 950 18.9 19.1 100.0
. 54 1.1 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4962 Missing cases 54
PNTU Union Membership
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 78 1.5 1.7 1.7
YES 1.00 860 17.1 18.6 20.2
NO 2.00 3697 73.7 79.8 100.0
. 380 7.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4635 Missing cases 380
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PPNTU Partner Union Membership
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 114 2.3 3.5 3.5
YES 1.00 641 12.8 20.0 23.5
NO 2.00 2455 48.9 76.5 100.0
. 1805 36.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3210 Missing cases 1805
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PHTU
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 176 3.5 11.1 11.1
YES 1.00 163 3.2 10.3 21.4
NO 2.00 1240 24.7 78.6 100.0
. 3436 68.5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 1579 Missing cases 3436
Q1WK
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
.00 3705 73.9 91.0 91.0
1.00 312 6.2 7.7 98.6
2.00 22 .4 .5 99.1
3.00 25 .5 .6 99.8
4.00 3 .1 .1 99.8
5.00 4 .1 .1 99.9
7.00 3 .1 .1 100.0
. 942 18.8 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4073 Missing cases 942
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Q2WK
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
.00 47 .9 1.1 1.1
1.00 2076 41.4 51.0 52.1
2.00 387 7.7 9.5 61.6
3.00 242 4.8 6.0 67.6
4.00 127 2.5 3.1 70.7
5.00 862 17.2 21.2 91.8
6.00 54 1.1 1.3 93.2
7.00 57 1.1 1.4 94.6
8.00 185 3.7 4.5 99.1
9.00 36 .7 .9 100.0
. 943 18.8 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4073 Missing cases 943
PNWORK Work Status
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
FULL 1.00 2321 46.3 47.2 47.2
PART 15HRS+ 2.00 501 10.0 10.2 57.4
PART -15 3.00 299 6.0 6.1 63.5
UNEMPLOYED 4.00 167 3.3 3.4 66.9
RETIRED 5.00 964 19.2 19.6 86.5
DISABLED - TEMP 6.00 70 1.4 1.4 88.0
DISABLED - PERM 7.00 60 1.2 1.2 89.2
SCHOOL 8.00 141 2.8 2.9 92.0
UNPAID-FAMILY 9.00 36 .7 .7 92.8
OTHER UNPAID 10.00 56 1.1 1.1 93.9
HOUSE 11.00 299 6.0 6.1 100.0
. 100 2.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4915 Missing cases 100
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PNWORKP Partner Work Status
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 16 .3 .5 .5
FULL 1.00 1714 34.2 50.9 51.4
PART 15HRS+ 2.00 336 6.7 10.0 61.3
PART -15 3.00 172 3.4 5.1 66.4
UNEMPLOYED 4.00 72 1.4 2.1 68.6
RETIRED 5.00 624 12.4 18.5 87.1
DISABLED - TEMP 6.00 20 .4 .6 87.7
DISABLED - PERM 7.00 36 .7 1.1 88.8
SCHOOL 8.00 48 .9 1.4 90.2
UNPAID-FAMILY 9.00 29 .6 .8 91.0
OTHER UNPAID 10.00 30 .6 .9 91.9
HOUSE 11.00 272 5.4 8.1 100.0
. 1646 32.8 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3369 Missing cases 1646
QWKWHO Who Work For
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 76 1.5 1.6 1.6
PRIVATE 1.00 2541 50.7 53.1 54.7
GOVT 2.00 339 6.8 7.1 61.7
HEALTH EDUCATION 3.00 452 9.0 9.5 71.2
SOE 4.00 265 5.3 5.5 76.7
MIXED 5.00 156 3.1 3.3 80.0
NONPROF 6.00 160 3.2 3.3 83.3
SELFEMPL 7.00 728 14.5 15.2 98.5
NEVER EMPLOYED 8.00 70 1.4 1.5 100.0
. 229 4.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4786 Missing cases 229
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PQWKWHO Who Partner Work For
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 82 1.6 2.5 2.5
PRIVATE 1.00 1692 33.7 52.3 54.9
GOVT 2.00 177 3.5 5.5 60.3
HEALTH EDUCATION 3.00 286 5.7 8.9 69.2
SOE 4.00 184 3.7 5.7 74.9
MIXED 5.00 95 1.9 2.9 77.8
NONPROF 6.00 74 1.5 2.3 80.1
SELFEMPL 7.00 555 11.1 17.2 97.3
NEVER EMPLOYED 8.00 88 1.8 2.7 100.0
. 1782 35.5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3234 Missing cases 1782
PSUP Supervisor or Not
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
YES 1.00 1776 35.4 45.4 45.4
NO 2.00 2139 42.6 54.6 100.0
. 1100 21.9 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3915 Missing cases 1100
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PSUPP Partner Supervisor or Not
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
YES 1.00 1254 25.0 45.9 45.9
NO 2.00 1479 29.5 54.1 100.0
. 2283 45.5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 2732 Missing cases 2283
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
QJOB Paid Job
Valid cases 4578 Missing cases 437
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
QIND Industry Work In
Valid cases 4550 Missing cases 466
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
QPJOB Partner Paid Job
Valid cases 3001 Missing cases 2014
QPIND Partner Industry Work In
Valid cases 3008 Missing cases 2008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|