|
|
Elections and Electoral Issues, 1996
PVSMALL Keep Very Small Parties Out
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 238 4.7 6.1 6.1
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 358 7.1 9.2 15.4
AGREE 2.00 699 13.9 18.0 33.4
NEITHER 3.00 749 14.9 19.3 52.7
DISAGREE 4.00 1442 28.7 37.2 89.8
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 394 7.9 10.2 100.0
. 1136 22.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3880 Missing cases 1136
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PSHARE Give Fair Share
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 503 10.0 12.9 12.9
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 463 9.2 11.9 24.8
AGREE 2.00 1739 34.7 44.7 69.5
NEITHER 3.00 692 13.8 17.8 87.3
DISAGREE 4.00 425 8.5 10.9 98.2
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 71 1.4 1.8 100.0
. 1123 22.4 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3892 Missing cases 1123
PONEPAR One Party Forms Government
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 278 5.5 7.1 7.1
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 627 12.5 16.1 23.2
AGREE 2.00 1029 20.5 26.4 49.7
NEITHER 3.00 812 16.2 20.9 70.6
DISAGREE 4.00 946 18.9 24.3 94.9
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 199 4.0 5.1 100.0
. 1123 22.4 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3892 Missing cases 1123
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PHALF Government At Least Half Support
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 335 6.7 8.6 8.6
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 625 12.5 16.1 24.7
AGREE 2.00 1686 33.6 43.4 68.2
NEITHER 3.00 732 14.6 18.9 87.0
DISAGREE 4.00 428 8.5 11.0 98.1
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 76 1.5 1.9 100.0
. 1134 22.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3882 Missing cases 1134
PSTABIL Providing Stability
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DK .00 398 7.9 9.9 9.9
SINGLE BEST 1.00 1824 36.4 45.6 55.6
MORE BEST 2.00 1395 27.8 34.9 90.4
SAME 3.00 382 7.6 9.6 100.0
. 1017 20.3 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3999 Missing cases 1017
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PTOUGH Making tough Decisions
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DK .00 342 6.8 8.6 8.6
SINGLE BEST 1.00 1394 27.8 35.2 43.8
MORE BEST 2.00 1873 37.4 47.3 91.1
SAME 3.00 352 7.0 8.9 100.0
. 1055 21.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3961 Missing cases 1055
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PPROM Keeping Promises
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DK .00 405 8.1 10.1 10.1
SINGLE BEST 1.00 785 15.6 19.6 29.8
MORE BEST 2.00 2310 46.1 57.8 87.6
SAME 3.00 496 9.9 12.4 100.0
. 1020 20.3 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3996 Missing cases 1020
PWANT Doing What People Want
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DK .00 458 9.1 11.5 11.5
SINGLE BEST 1.00 402 8.0 10.1 21.5
MORE BEST 2.00 2522 50.3 63.2 84.7
SAME 3.00 611 12.2 15.3 100.0
. 1023 20.4 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3992 Missing cases 1023
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PTYPEM More Maori MPs
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 281 5.6 7.1 7.1
YES 1.00 559 11.2 14.1 21.1
NO 2.00 1128 22.5 28.4 49.5
DEPENDS 3.00 2011 40.1 50.5 100.0
. 1035 20.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3980 Missing cases 1035
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PTYPEW More Women MPs
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 245 4.9 6.1 6.1
YES 1.00 1189 23.7 29.6 35.7
NO 2.00 614 12.3 15.3 50.9
DEPENDS 3.00 1973 39.3 49.1 100.0
. 995 19.8 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4021 Missing cases 995
PTYPEP More Polynesian MPs
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 343 6.8 8.7 8.7
YES 1.00 448 8.9 11.4 20.1
NO 2.00 1166 23.3 29.7 49.8
DEPENDS 3.00 1974 39.4 50.2 100.0
. 1084 21.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3931 Missing cases 1084
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PTYPEI More Independent MPs
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 469 9.3 11.8 11.8
YES 1.00 644 12.8 16.2 27.9
NO 2.00 896 17.9 22.5 50.4
DEPENDS 3.00 1973 39.3 49.6 100.0
. 1034 20.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3981 Missing cases 1034
PMPNAME Name of Previous Local MP
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
RIGHT 1.00 2384 47.5 58.1 58.1
WRONG MP RIGHT CAN 2.00 332 6.6 8.1 66.2
WRONG 3.00 239 4.8 5.8 72.0
MP OTHER 4.00 49 1.0 1.2 73.2
DONT KNOW 9.00 1100 21.9 26.8 100.0
. 912 18.2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4103 Missing cases 912
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PLOCPAR Knows Party Previous MP
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
.00 1 .0 .0 .0
RIGHT 1.00 2597 51.8 63.3 63.4
WRONG MP RIGHT CAN 2.00 1 .0 .0 63.4
WRONG 3.00 380 7.6 9.3 72.7
RIGHT 93 WRONG 96 4.00 209 4.2 5.1 77.8
DONT KNOW 9.00 912 18.2 22.2 100.0
. 915 18.2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4100 Missing cases 915
PMEET Met MP Personally?
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 3626 72.3 87.1 87.1
YES 1.00 537 10.7 12.9 100.0
. 853 17.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4163 Missing cases 853
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PATTEND Attend Meeting with MP?
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 3725 74.3 89.5 89.5
YES 1.00 438 8.7 10.5 100.0
. 853 17.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4163 Missing cases 853
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PMAIL Received Mail From MP
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 1423 28.4 34.2 34.2
YES 1.00 2740 54.6 65.8 100.0
. 853 17.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4163 Missing cases 853
PREADMP Read About MP
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 1077 21.5 25.9 25.9
YES 1.00 3086 61.5 74.1 100.0
. 853 17.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4163 Missing cases 853
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PHEARMP Heard MP on Radio
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 2687 53.6 64.6 64.6
YES 1.00 1476 29.4 35.4 100.0
. 853 17.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4163 Missing cases 853
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PSEETV See MP on TV
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 2487 49.6 59.7 59.7
YES 1.00 1676 33.4 40.3 100.0
. 853 17.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4163 Missing cases 853
PMPCONT Family contact With MP
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
YES 1.00 934 18.6 22.4 22.4
NO 2.00 3228 64.4 77.6 100.0
. 853 17.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4163 Missing cases 853
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POPIN Contact MP Express opinion
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 206 4.1 40.1 40.1
YES 1.00 308 6.1 59.9 100.0
. 4501 89.7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 514 Missing cases 4501
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PINFO Contact MP to Seek Information
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 166 3.3 30.6 30.6
YES 1.00 377 7.5 69.4 100.0
. 4472 89.2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 543 Missing cases 4472
PHELP Contact MP Seek Help
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NO .00 181 3.6 26.4 26.4
YES 1.00 505 10.1 73.6 100.0
. 4330 86.3 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 685 Missing cases 4330
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PMPSAT Satisfied With MP Response
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
VERY 1.00 372 7.4 40.2 40.2
SOMEWHAT 2.00 275 5.5 29.8 70.0
NOT VERY 3.00 145 2.9 15.7 85.7
NOT ALL 4.00 133 2.6 14.3 100.0
. 4091 81.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 925 Missing cases 4091
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PMPAPP Approval of Local MP
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DK .00 615 12.3 15.0 15.0
STRONG APPROV 1.00 396 7.9 9.6 24.6
APPROV 2.00 1195 23.8 29.1 53.7
NEITHER 3.00 1276 25.4 31.1 84.7
DISAPPR 4.00 444 8.9 10.8 95.5
STRONG DIS 5.00 184 3.7 4.5 100.0
. 906 18.1 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4109 Missing cases 906
PWASTE Vote is Wasted
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 112 2.2 2.8 2.8
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 446 8.9 11.1 13.9
AGREE 2.00 746 14.9 18.6 32.5
NEITHER 3.00 328 6.5 8.2 40.7
DISAGREE 4.00 1854 37.0 46.2 86.9
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 526 10.5 13.1 100.0
. 1001 20.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4014 Missing cases 1001
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PDUTY Citizens Duty to Vote
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 63 1.3 1.6 1.6
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 1861 37.1 45.7 47.3
AGREE 2.00 1554 31.0 38.2 85.5
NEITHER 3.00 323 6.4 7.9 93.4
DISAGREE 4.00 178 3.6 4.4 97.8
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 89 1.8 2.2 100.0
. 947 18.9 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4069 Missing cases 947
PVIMPT Voting is Important
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 79 1.6 2.0 2.0
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 1366 27.2 34.0 36.0
AGREE 2.00 1905 38.0 47.4 83.4
NEITHER 3.00 295 5.9 7.3 90.7
DISAGREE 4.00 275 5.5 6.8 97.6
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 97 1.9 2.4 100.0
. 999 19.9 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4016 Missing cases 999
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PNOUSE No Use Voting If going to Win
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 71 1.4 1.8 1.8
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 118 2.3 2.9 4.7
AGREE 2.00 132 2.6 3.3 8.0
NEITHER 3.00 182 3.6 4.5 12.5
DISAGREE 4.00 2176 43.4 54.0 66.5
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 1350 26.9 33.5 100.0
. 987 19.7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4028 Missing cases 987
PCOUNT My vote Really Counts
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 170 3.4 4.2 4.2
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 1332 26.6 32.9 37.1
AGREE 2.00 2123 42.3 52.4 89.5
NEITHER 3.00 316 6.3 7.8 97.3
DISAGREE 4.00 72 1.4 1.8 99.1
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 36 .7 .9 100.0
. 967 19.3 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4048 Missing cases 967
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHANCE Not important vote if party lose
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 105 2.1 2.6 2.6
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 94 1.9 2.3 4.9
AGREE 2.00 180 3.6 4.5 9.4
NEITHER 3.00 215 4.3 5.3 14.8
DISAGREE 4.00 2145 42.8 53.3 68.1
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 1284 25.6 31.9 100.0
. 993 19.8 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4022 Missing cases 993
PBOUND Parties Should Make and Keep Promises
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 67 1.3 1.6 1.6
KEEP PROMISES 1.00 1265 25.2 31.2 32.8
2.00 1013 20.2 24.9 57.8
3.00 712 14.2 17.5 75.3
4.00 332 6.6 8.2 83.5
5.00 256 5.1 6.3 89.8
6.00 171 3.4 4.2 94.0
NO PROMISES 7.00 243 4.8 6.0 100.0
. 956 19.1 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4059 Missing cases 956
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PBESTNZ Choose Best for NZ
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 111 2.2 2.8 2.8
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 2153 42.9 53.6 56.4
AGREE 2.00 1597 31.8 39.7 96.1
NEITHER 3.00 135 2.7 3.4 99.4
DISAGREE 4.00 15 .3 .4 99.8
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 8 .2 .2 100.0
. 996 19.9 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4019 Missing cases 996
PLOYAL Show Loyalty to Party
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 148 2.9 3.8 3.8
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 351 7.0 9.0 12.8
AGREE 2.00 788 15.7 20.2 32.9
NEITHER 3.00 1280 25.5 32.7 65.7
DISAGREE 4.00 882 17.6 22.6 88.2
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 460 9.2 11.8 100.0
. 1107 22.1 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3908 Missing cases 1107
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FINCOAL Help find coalition partner
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 260 5.2 6.7 6.7
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 341 6.8 8.8 15.5
AGREE 2.00 946 18.9 24.3 39.8
NEITHER 3.00 1282 25.6 33.0 72.8
DISAGREE 4.00 779 15.5 20.1 92.9
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 277 5.5 7.1 100.0
. 1129 22.5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3886 Missing cases 1129
PDISLK Voting Against Government
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 200 4.0 5.1 5.1
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 905 18.0 23.2 28.3
AGREE 2.00 1169 23.3 30.0 58.3
NEITHER 3.00 706 14.1 18.1 76.4
DISAGREE 4.00 648 12.9 16.6 93.0
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 272 5.4 7.0 100.0
. 1114 22.2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3901 Missing cases 1114
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PSTABLE Vote for Stable Government
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DONT KNOW .00 139 2.8 3.5 3.5
STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 1420 28.3 35.9 39.4
AGREE 2.00 1922 38.3 48.6 88.1
NEITHER 3.00 384 7.7 9.7 97.8
DISAGREE 4.00 61 1.2 1.5 99.3
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 27 .5 .7 100.0
. 1063 21.2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 3952 Missing cases 1063
UNMMP Understanding of MMP
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
UNDERSTAND 1.00 1434 28.6 29.2 29.2
2.00 1712 34.1 34.9 64.1
3.00 1093 21.8 22.3 86.3
4.00 362 7.2 7.4 93.7
DONT 5.00 311 6.2 6.3 100.0
. 103 2.1 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4912 Missing cases 103
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
QU1Z
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
TRUE 1.00 2335 46.6 58.3 58.3
FALSE 2.00 337 6.7 8.4 66.7
DONT KNOW 3.00 1335 26.6 33.3 100.0
. 1008 20.1 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4007 Missing cases 1008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
QU2Z
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
TRUE 1.00 472 9.4 9.7 9.7
FALSE 2.00 3118 62.2 64.0 73.7
DONT KNOW 3.00 1282 25.6 26.3 100.0
. 143 2.8 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4872 Missing cases 143
QU3Z
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
TRUE 1.00 3384 67.5 69.3 69.3
FALSE 2.00 580 11.6 11.9 81.2
DONT KNOW 3.00 921 18.4 18.8 100.0
. 131 2.6 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4885 Missing cases 131
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
QU4Z
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
TRUE 1.00 1246 24.9 25.5 25.5
FALSE 2.00 1575 31.4 32.3 57.8
DONT KNOW 3.00 2057 41.0 42.2 100.0
. 137 2.7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 5015 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 4879 Missing cases 137
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|